How We Test Golf Balls

Robot testing removes variability, but golf is a game of variability.

Our testing replicates how most golfers actually play, not how a robot swings or elite tour players perform under perfectly repeatable conditions. We use human testing because it allows us to evaluate golf balls the way most players actually experience them on the course.

This approach helps us identify:

• Differences golfers can actually feel
• Ball behaviors that appear under real swing conditions
• Performance tradeoffs that show up over multiple shots, not perfect swings

Robot testing is extremely effective at isolating small, repeatable performance differences between golf balls. But those differences are most relevant to a very narrow slice of golfers. Roughly 1% of the 28.1 million Americans who play golf each year play to a 5.0 handicap or better, meaning the overwhelming majority of players simply won’t see those minute differences show up on the course.

Our human testing is designed to strike a balance. We maintain tight standards around swing speed, club delivery (face and path), and launch conditions, while still allowing for the natural swing-to-swing variance that defines how most golfers actually play. The result is testing that’s controlled and repeatable, yet reflective of how 5–25 handicap golfers experience golf balls in the real world.

Each golf ball is tested using three shots that represent the majority of real-world golf performance:

• Driver
• 7-Iron
• 50-Yard Shot

Testing these three shots allows us to evaluate distance, accuracy, and stopping power from tee to green.

Simply hitting shots that travel 50 yards with a variety of golf balls would require different swing inputs for each ball, due to differences in ball speed and launch characteristics. That would introduce variability we want to attribute to the golf ball itself, not the swing.

Instead, we worked backwards to identify the swing and delivery inputs that consistently produced a 50-yard shot with the Titleist Pro V1. We then built performance bands based on those inputs to standardize our 50-yard shot test across all balls. Because we standardized the inputs, not the total distance, some balls traveled more or less than 50 yards.

Our goal was not to create a “perfect” wedge swing, but one that reflects how golfers actually hit scoring shots. We look at spin, apex, and descent angle to evaluate control and stopping power.

To ensure fair, repeatable results, we test every golf ball under tightly controlled swing and impact conditions.

Our shot-quality parameters are based largely on LPGA Tour averages, which closely mirrors the swing speeds, launch conditions, and ball flights of skilled amateur golfers. This allows us to isolate ball performance rather than test how a ball behaves at tour-level or robot-level swing speeds.

For each club and golf ball:

• Shots must fall within narrow, predefined ranges for speed, impact efficiency, launch, and delivery
• We collect 12 qualifying shots for each club
• From those, we select the eight shots with the most consistent inputs
• All reported averages and scores are calculated using those eight shots

This process minimizes outliers while preserving the natural variability that real golfers experience.

All testing is conducted using the SkyTrak ST Max launch monitor, which allows us to capture high-fidelity ball flight and impact data across driver, iron, and short-game shots.

Depending on the club, we track metrics such as:

• Ball speed and launch angle
• Back spin and side spin
• Carry, roll, and total distance
• Peak height and descent angle
• Dispersion patterns

Rather than publishing large tables of raw numbers, we use this data to create standardized performance scores that make meaningful ball-to-ball comparisons easier for most golfers.

To make our results useful for the majority of golfers, not just the few who understand every launch metric, we convert raw data into 1–10 performance scores.

Our Stopping Power score measures how quickly and predictably a ball stops on the green.

It combines data from 7-iron and 50-yard shots, including:

• Backspin
• Roll
• Apex
• Descent angle

Distance evaluates how far the ball travels off the tee and with irons.

Distance Score is based on:

• Total distance with driver
• Total distance with 7-iron

Driver distance is weighted more heavily, reflecting its importance for most golfers.

Accuracy measures how consistently a ball flies on line.

Accuracy Score considers:

• Sidespin
• Dispersion patterns with driver and 7-iron

The Performance score is a composite rating that combines:

• Distance
• Accuracy
• Stopping Power

This score reflects how the ball performs across the entire bag.

Value balances performance and price.

Our Value Score considers:

• Performance score
• Price per dozen (based on the lowest available price when purchasing two dozen or fewer)

Our Total Score combines:

• Performance
• Value

Performance is weighted more heavily, ensuring the highest-rated balls are strong performers and that cheap options don’t get inflated scores based on price alone.

No test is perfect, and even with tight input parameters, testing golf balls with humans, not robots, introduces additional variability. 

The following are the limitations of our testing:

• Results reflect our testers’ swing profiles, not every possible golfer
• Environmental conditions can never be 100% identical
• Extremely small performance differences between balls may not appear in our data

Our testing is not intended to declare a single “best ball for everyone.”

Instead, it’s designed to help the majority of golfers make more informed purchasing decisions and find the ball, or a selection of balls, that make the most sense to test in their own game.

We may refine our testing protocols as we gather more data. When our process changes, we update our results and explain why.

Our goal isn’t perfection. It’s usefulness, clarity, and honesty.

If you ever have questions about how we test or how to interpret our scores, we encourage you to reach out to GolfLink Editor Nick Heidelberger (nicholas@golflink.com).